Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sam Riffice vs Facundo Mena Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Riffice vs Mena analysis and find out who is favored!
Sam Riffice vs Facundo Mena Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Riffice 1 - 0 Mena
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Riffice has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mena has won 51.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Riffice, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mena has won 55.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Riffice has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mena has saved 60.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Riffice has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mena winning 69.51% (W/L 57/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Riffice has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 43/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Riffice winning 1 times and Mena being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Riffice winning 2 and Mena winning 0. The last match between Riffice and Mena was at the USA F15 (Vero Beach), 28-04-2017, Quarterfinals, Clay with Sam Riffice getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Riffice and Mena have played a deciding set 0 times, with Riffice winning 0 times and Mena 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Riffice winning 0, and Mena 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Riffice has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mena has played against players with an average rank of 265.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Riffice has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mena has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Riffice has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mena has converted 52.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
698
Rank
487
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
307
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
64% (108-61)
Career Total W/L
57% (472-356)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
68% (30-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$140,110
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Sam Riffice vs Facundo Mena For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Riffice VS Mena
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Sam Riffice | Facundo Mena |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (22/33) | 46% (24/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 91% (20/22) | 46% (11/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 73% (8/11) | 39% (11/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (30/52) | 15% (5/33) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Sam Riffice
Player
Facundo Mena
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sam Riffice | Facundo Mena |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 68% (30/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (63/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (508/389) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (27/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 178 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 314.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (1519/2710) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (1079/1519) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (613/1191) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 52% (166/319) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (1296/2900) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (17/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (13/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (30/44) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 96% (26/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 4% (26/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 28% (18/5) |
Sam Riffice Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Sam Riffice
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Alexis Galarneau
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Christian Langmo
63%
(
75 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
6
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
43 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
120
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Ezekiel Clark
51%
(
61 of
119)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
109)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Jack Pinnington Jones
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Sam Riffice
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Evan King
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
7
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
27%
(
29 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
112
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Blu Baker
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
47%
(
8 of
17)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22
Total Points Won
9
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Facundo Mena
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
84 of
118)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
60 of
84)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
27 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Facundo Mena
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
108)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
11
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Emilio Gomez
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
111)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Riffice Vs Mena Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Riffice are available here and Mena photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Facundo Mena
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
